FCA publishes DB pension transfer advice review findings
By IAN Editorial Desk The FCA has published the findings of its latest review into defined benefit (DB) pension transfer advice, highlighting persistent...
The FCA has published the findings of its latest review into defined benefit (DB) pension transfer advice, highlighting persistent suitability failings despite earlier reforms to the advice framework in 2017–2018. The conclusions matter for insurers both as DB de‑risking counterparties and as providers of DC and retirement solutions that receive transferred assets. For CIOs and capital teams, the review underlines ongoing conduct and redress risk in DB transfer flows that ultimately fund bulk annuity and DC investment strategies.
- The regulator’s focus on unsuitable or unclear product and fund recommendations raises the risk that some insurer-backed solutions used post‑transfer are revisited in redress calculations.
- The FCA’s insistence that all transfer advice be a personal recommendation hardens the liability perimeter around advice chains feeding into insurer platforms and funds.
- Periodic reviews of redress guidance mean the economic cost of historic transfer waves remains a moving target for balance sheet and capital planning.
Advice framework and suitability standards
The FCA’s 2017 assessing suitability review reported that around 90% of advice on pensions and investments was suitable, but DB transfer advice was a clear outlier. The regulator stated it was “very concerned” that too many firms were not consistently providing suitable advice on transfers, signalling that DB business sat materially below the broader advice standard.
In response, the FCA used CP17/16 to propose updates to pension transfer requirements, and then PS18/6 to introduce a new rules and guidance framework aimed at enabling better quality transfer advice. The core rule change required that all advice on pension transfers must be given as a personal recommendation, increasing accountability for the suitability of each individual transfer decision. For insurers, this means advice feeding assets into their products is explicitly framed as personalised, increasing the likelihood that unsuitable flows translate into redress exposure somewhere in the value chain.
Register to see the rest of this article
Registration is free and takes a moment. It opens every article and the complete archive, the Economic Dashboard, the events calendar and the company directories.
Register freeAlready have an account? Sign in


